We're off for a preview of the Sectional course on Saturday. We should be looking to improve both the quantity and quality of our finishers this year.
In 2006, we had just 5 boys and 3 girls finish. The meet official messed up the timing of the boys race, so we don't have times. At sectionals, only one runner was under 19:59, but 6th was 20:17. For the girls, Ashley ran well (21:55), but the others were 25:41 and 26:38. At sectionals, Brianna was first for the team in 21:54, 5th was 24:39 and 7th was 25:34.
In 2007, we had 14 boys and 11 girls finish. Chris ran 19:42, no one else was under 20 minutes. Our 5th man was 21:09 and 7th was 21:39. Sectionals was much better, with our 7th man at 19:40 and Nico led the way in 18:17. For the girls, only 5 girls were under 28 minutes, with Megan first in 23:07. They were also much better at sectionals, with the 5th girl at 23:40, and Megan running 21:18.
This year we have 40 runners on our roster. I think a few injured runners will miss this meet, but we should have a much better turnout than last year. We should be able to put 5 runners under 19:42 (perhaps 3 under 19:00?), and 7 under 20 minutes. We should also be able to put 5 girls under 26 minutes, perhaps 7 under 28 minutes.
Looking back at the splits from last year's invitational and sectionals, one thing is clear: the first mile was run far too fast at the invitational. The top 7 boys slowed by an average of 1:08 from the first mile to the second. A couple of boys that did not break 20 minutes, were through the mile in 5:35-5:36. The top 7 girls slowed by 1:33. At Sectionals, the boys slowed by just 43 seconds, the girls by 58 seconds. The smart runner will learn from this, and run very conservatively for the first mile - it's downhill and has to be completed without much effort, so that you are in position to pass the dying multitudes over the next 1.5 miles.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
"The top 7 boys slowed by an average of 1:08 from the first mile to the second." - That's unheard of! Imagine running a 5:30 the first mile, and then a 6:38 the next? Ridiculous.
a side note, can we talk about how the race should be run on saturday at tomorrows practice? If we're looking to sweep on Tuesday, should we hold back anything to conserve it?
Post a Comment